1. Moving materials to a separate location can discourage use, especially for young people who may be questioning their sexuality. By moving this material to a separate section, the young person may be too embarrassed to look for books in the "special section." In this case, you have effectively made the books off limits and denied information to the people who need it the most. By creating a separate section, you have effectively said "these people in these books are not the norm" and we don't want to send that message to our communities.
2. By putting these things in with the regular collection, patrons may be more likely to stumble upon a book and choose it without knowing exactly what it includes. It removes the bias of choosing a book about someone who is different than you are. And hopefully, patrons may read about these people and learn a little bit about their history and their lifestyle, and perhaps remove some of the stigma these people face.
3. If we create sections about GLBTQ and African American fiction, where to we go next? Where do we draw the line? Should we remove all other nationalities to their own section? Do we create a heterosexual section? Who decides what gets placed in each section? If there's one marginal gay character, is it GLBTQ? This opens up more confusion than what is necessary.
So, say you have a population asking for it, who doesn't want to marginalize it, but instead celebrate it and promote the materials. You can still do this through readers' advisory, book lists, blog posts, and book displays. Make it easier for your patrons to find this materials while still integrating it into the regular collection.
Yeah I sort of questioning what exactly defines these genres, do we give everyone their own, and what we do if this the book is more than one genre ( cuz there might be something like a Deaf Asian Street Lit Romance. One person might say romance but the other groups might argue so you would have to make one special shelf or break up the book to please everyone. And I'm wondering what would left on the regular shelf- white males who have no cultural,religious, sexual orientation, or whatever or the shelf would be all gone and a bunch of mini-collections.) I agree, displays and what ever else might be more helpful
ReplyDeleteYes, agreed! Put the books together -- it isn't like a special display couldn't still be accomplished at some point ... but, why separate totally - just more work when "looking" for a title & for a shelver who has to remember where all "the sections" are located! I don't like it when I have to tell a patron, well, wait a second, I have to see where the book actually is listed ... whether it is regular Non-Fiction, New Non-Fiction, Large Print Non-Fiction, etc. etc. -- drives me crazy!
ReplyDeleteMy branch is next to Garfield Park (the park). Part of its renovation a couple years ago was to establish a "green" collection of books. Occasionally there has been an Earth Day display. This means that during some parts of the year, a book could be on one of the following shelves: 1) green collection, 2) Earth Day display, 3) regular non-fiction shelf or 4) New non-fiction shelf. For all of these, the call number would just describe the book with a Dewey call number. I agree that pulling books out of the regular collection (particularly without telling the computer) can make things complicated.
ReplyDeleteI can imagine how that would be confusing! I do love that my home library has a location designation called "On Display" because it lets you know not to look on the general shelves. While I love when people come and ask questions, I think patrons should be able to navigate the library without having to ask the expert. It's another argument for keeping the fiction genres shelved together; it's easier to find what you're looking for if there are fewer sections to search.
DeleteYou made a great point about patrons not being able to stumble across these books if they are separated. I'm sure there are many great GLBTQ and African American fiction books out there, and all kinds of people could enjoy them. But separating them definitely makes it less likely that people will check them out.
ReplyDeleteI too thought that these genres should not be separated but these materials definitely need to be marketed and not forgotten at the library. Clearly there is an audience for these items.
ReplyDelete